The problem of low economic growth in the United States is
because there is a phenomenon of bipolar, the US economy began
to recover once the congress began to put limits on spending plans of President
Obama this again is a discussion of course that there are others who say that
this is the American economy is not growing is sufficient because
precisely been cuts then this same people applauded the fact that now less than
3 per cent are well, without doubt this been major cuts at the
level of federal spending as a proportion of the economic because if
the expenditure in real terms has been increased this year after year is in The
Government provides to the economy.
The congress is ensuring that the economy began
to recover however remains the slower recovery since the Second World War
and the rate of American projections was linked to a level which is half of
what it was before the economic crisis gave me explanations that this has
to do a lot with the lost economic freedom that has faced the U.S. economy we
have seen for example the economic index in the ranking of economic
freedom step being the third largest economy in the world to fall
free a position where it has been between 16 and 12 to a place so that also
explains this And a lot of factors, lost growth potential of the economy of the
United States.
We have a phenomenon which is very clear and that
is that the average wages the average income in real terms
in the United States has been stalled for many years and this of course that
particularly affected the middle class who feel that they are losing is the WHO
that the policies are benefiting now comes before all these
types of populism is the right populism that represent Donald
Trump another that says that this is the fault of the immigrants
in the guilt of the Mexican aliens the Chinese immigrants who come to this
country to depress wages and other and Then there is left-wing populism that
is Sandro is that says the blame for the billionaires who have played
with the system and which benefits extraordinarily their own
benefit, what we have to do is make sure that you remove from
the rich to give to the middle class we all have to all of populism which
of course are harmful, there is a sealed in a there are populism but are also
tired with the political class of Clinton that represent to the shaft to
continue with the status quo which for some is the same and that passes with
crop on the republican side with a lot of silver in the pockets however
are taking the Same aspect with Sanders that has to
Donald Trump that is considered as that is not of the stagnation and
in part what is happening than the North American market is tired
of the political establishment.
The 70% Republicans say that this candidate
that belongs to the establishment in the case of the democrats this
the heart of them this side of gibberish we see that even
a plurality of voters in Iowa said They
considered socialist this and good we know that come
Andres is an author confessed socialist, but is being
a little more pragmatic and the fact that they can put into power,
the first woman in history as president is also playing a
factor i think i vote that there is a first as well
as Barack Obama also broke the paradigms they feel that a Hillary Clinton
despite having 30 years in power to be
here pumping Washington already offers the rupture of
the paradigm as is the Put a woman president, being a
little more pragmatic said in the letter winner is Hillary
Clinton and apart from that the comfort to many people.