central banks in Japan and Europe to fight deflation

The negative interest rates set by the central banks in Japan and Europe to combat deflation are good for the world economy, estimated this Friday Christine Lagarde, director of the International Monetary Fund. It is an excellent news for close the week with this you begin to see the recovery of the global economy, this is good for the United States of North America and for the European Union, this is intended to achieve goals that for reasons of the decline of the economy have been abandoned.

In an interview with Bloomberg TV, Lagarde said that the unconventional measure of negative rates of short term, in which commercial banks pay to the central banks to store their money, had probably contributed to stronger economic growth.

"Implement these negative rates under the current circumstances was a good thing," he added.

Several European central banks and the Bank of Japan have taken these measures during the last year with a view to increasing the circulation of money in the economy and generate more investment and more expenses.

The economy of Japan has been recovering since the Second World War, and this helps the global economy although the company Americans prefer to invest in the Japanese market and contribute to the economic growth of that country.

Currently Japan is one of the most advanced industrialized countries of the world leaving to one side to China.

In theory, this mechanism should work, but economists are currently studying its effect in Europe and Japan, with the fear that generate suspicion among consumers to consume. It is expected that for the next year the interest rates come down 10% of what it was paying.

The American candidate Donald Trump has promised to do the United States large again is one of their electoral campaign promises

The American candidate Donald Trump has promised to do the United States large again is one of their electoral campaign promises, its objective is to put an end to the export of jobs and retrieve the that have been deleted, the candidate despite the opposition he remains with the promise to act for the country.

His words he has said are: I am going to bring back the work of China, I am going to bring back the work Mexico and Japan, said in the presidential debate on 13 February.

One of the main objectives of the Republican candidate is to allow treaties to ensure and assist the small entrepreneurs, in this way would be that companies within the country spent a lot of money and American transferring them to underdeveloped countries where labor and costs are lower.

An organization that is put to the nomination of New York, published in its web page data with the products that the candidate country has imported from those countries that criticizes, this is ironic for many people, as it is possible that the candidate this trying very badly to these countries and being benefited by the same. This is a problem for many foreigners living in the country.

We can see the records that indicate that since 2006 its empire has imported 1,400 shipments, that only include those that explicitly name your last name.

China and Hong Kong are the main places listed as a source of imports, the majority of the products are of fashion that are being shoes, clothes, jewelry and other. And this story does not end here, as well as it does with Mexico also does so with many countries of Latin America including the problem with immigrants, we do not know what would happen if this candidate to take possession of the power in the forthcoming elections to the North American country. A datum curies is that when you built your resort in Florida, single contract to 20 Americans 300 that applied. The majority of those who were left with jobs were migrants from several countries.

One of the things I have heard say of the candidate American were: to subcontract jobs, such as send jobs outside of our companies contributes to the fall of the American business. But I have to take the position that there is always something terrible, wrote in a page of the university.

This is a long list that has put many citizens against and in favor, what the cares is just look out for his own interests he doesn't mind the American citizen, this has been seen in its latest proposals that were analyzed by several experts on the topic of economy and politics.

On the publication, a presidency in charge of magante could intensify the political and security risks in the United States, despite the fact that he does not expect the billionaire go to be imposed to Hillary Clinton, whom he perceives as its most likely competition of the Democrat candidate.

In the press releases to the ranking of the EIU of a scale of 30, in which Trump is situated in the same level of risk that the growing threat that the jihadi terrorism to destabilize the global economy. In addition, that the strong language Trump used to go to Mexico and China in particular, could escalate rapidly toward a trade war, this will be as soon as you take possession in the White House of the United States.

A report of the economist includes among the more global risks also contains an acute economic slowdown, Russian interventions in the country of Ukraine the possibility that the crisis Syria preceding a new war.

Economy in the U.S. elections on CNN Money

The economic issue is important to the American voter, there is low economic growth, high level of indebtedness, mandatory expenditure, the cost of medical spending. The candidates have much emphasis in the tax system, topics such as lower taxs , is something that President Barack Obama is in agreement, although the rate of unemployment is very low.

The problem of low economic growth in the United States is because there is a phenomenon of bipolar, the US economy began to recover once the congress began to put limits on spending plans of President Obama this again is a discussion of course that there are others who say that this is the American economy is not growing is sufficient because precisely been cuts then this same people applauded the fact that now less than 3 per cent are well, without doubt this been major cuts at the level of federal spending as a proportion of the economic because if the expenditure in real terms has been increased this year after year is in The Government provides to the economy.

The congress is ensuring that the economy began to recover however remains the slower recovery since the Second World War and the rate of American projections was linked to a level which is half of what it was before the economic crisis gave me explanations that this has to do a lot with the lost economic freedom that has faced the U.S. economy we have seen for example the economic index in the ranking of economic freedom step being the third largest economy in the world to fall free a position where it has been between 16 and 12 to a place so that also explains this And a lot of factors, lost growth potential of the economy of the United States.

We have a phenomenon which is very clear and that is that the  average wages the average income in real terms in the United States has been stalled for many years and this of course that particularly affected the middle class who feel that they are losing is the WHO that the policies are benefiting now comes before all these types of populism is the right populism that represent Donald Trump another that says that this is the fault of the immigrants in the guilt of the Mexican aliens the Chinese immigrants who come to this country to depress wages and other and Then there is left-wing populism that is Sandro is that says the blame for the billionaires who have played with the system and which benefits extraordinarily their own benefit,  what we have to do is make sure that you remove from the rich to give to the middle class we all have to all of populism which of course are harmful, there is a sealed in a there are populism but are also tired with the political class of Clinton that represent to the shaft to continue with the status quo which for some is the same and that passes with crop on the republican side with a lot of silver in the pockets however are taking the Same aspect with Sanders that has to Donald Trump that is considered as that is not of the stagnation and in part what is happening than the North American market is tired of the political establishment.

The 70%  Republicans say that this candidate that belongs to the establishment in the case of the democrats this the heart of them this side of gibberish we see that even a plurality of voters in Iowa said    They considered socialist this and good we know that come Andres is an author confessed socialist, but is being a little more pragmatic and the fact that they can put into power, the first woman in history  as president is also playing a factor i think i vote that there is a first  as well as Barack Obama also broke the paradigms they feel that a Hillary Clinton despite having 30 years in power to be here pumping Washington already offers the rupture of the paradigm as is the Put a woman president, being a little more pragmatic said in the letter winner is Hillary Clinton and apart from that the comfort to many people.